[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FDL: wrong link in CVS?
|
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
|
Subject: |
Re: FDL: wrong link in CVS? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:59:31 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
Hi John,
On 2020-08-18 11:49, John Darrington wrote:
> Your proposal seems good to me.
>
> However the fdl is not something which we can change at will, since its
> copyright is owned by the FSF and they do not permit derivative works.
I agree that changing a license text is a delicate thing.
But there are 2 different texts of the FDL out there, and that link is the
only difference between them, so I guess this is just an old bug.
So the question is:
which of the 2 texts of the FDL license is the correct one?
The one from 'licenses' or the one from 'standards'?
Who can clarify?
Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny