Re: FDL: wrong link in CVS?

[John Darrington]

Okay,  thanks for the explanation.

I (re)copied the fdl verbatim from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.texi
which effectively makes the change you were proposing.

J'

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:59:31AM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
     Hi John,
     
     On 2020-08-18 11:49, John Darrington wrote:
     > Your proposal seems good to me.
     >
     > However the fdl is not something which we can change at will, since its
     > copyright is owned by the FSF and they do not permit derivative works.
     
     I agree that changing a license text is a delicate thing.
     
     But there are 2 different texts of the FDL out there, and that link is the
     only difference between them, so I guess this is just an old bug.
     
     So the question is:
     which of the 2 texts of the FDL license is the correct one?
     The one from 'licenses' or the one from 'standards'?
     
     Who can clarify?
     
     Thanks & have a nice day,
     Berny