[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:42:59 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Another related check that /would/ have caught this attempt would be
> > comparing the aclocal m4 files in a release against their (meta)upstream
> > sources before building a package. This is something distribution
> > maintainers could do without cooperation from upstream. If
> > m4/build-to-host.m4 had been recognized as coming from gnulib and
> > compared to the copy in gnulib, the nonempty diff would have been
> > suspicious.
I have a hunch that some effort is needed to do that comparison, but
that it is feasible to write a script to do it could make it easy.
Is that so?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, (continued)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Zack Weinberg, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Eric Gallager, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Russ Allbery, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Eric Gallager, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/02
- Re: checking aclocal m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/04
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Sam James, 2024/04/05
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/08
- Re: detecting modified m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/07
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/04
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/01