[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Apr 2024 18:32:01 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I'm currently looking at adding support for this to
> https://github.com/hlein/distro-backdoor-scanner.
Are you one of the important developers of that? I hope so,
There is a grave problem with github.com -- almost all access (even
read-only) requires running nonfree JS code. We shouldn't link to it
from GNU packages or gnu.org. (It is possible to do git clone,
if the user knows how to figure out the URL to use, but a user
can't get that URL from the github.com home page.)
So we are starting to removng links to github.com.
If you have influence in that project, could you ask them to create
a mirror on a repo that doesn't have that problem? One we could
post links to?
Even better, to move it to a more fredeom-respecting repository.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, (continued)
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Russ Allbery, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Eric Gallager, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/02
- Re: checking aclocal m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/04
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/04
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Sam James, 2024/04/05
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: detecting modified m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/07
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/04
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/01
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/02
- Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor, Richard Stallman, 2024/04/04
- Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/06
- Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor), Richard Stallman, 2024/04/08
- Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/08
- Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature, Jan Engelhardt, 2024/04/09