certi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement


From: Michael Raab
Subject: Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:37:14 +0100

I catch my exception inside the federate ambassador RAV callback function.
That is sufficient for me and has no influences on CERTI.

Michael

Dipl.-Inf. Michael Raab

Fraunhofer-Institut für Fabrikbetrieb und -automatisierung IFF
Virtuell Interaktives Training
Sandtorstr. 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany                
Telefon +49 (0) 391/ 40 90 122
Telefax +49 (0) 391/ 40 90 115
address@hidden
http://www.iff.fraunhofer.de oder http://www.vdtc.de



Von:        Eric Noulard <address@hidden>
An:        CERTI development discussions <address@hidden>
Datum:        11/26/2010 01:33 PM
Betreff:        Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
Gesendet von:        address@hidden




2010/11/26 Michael Raab <address@hidden>:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's no problem with the tick management. Sorry for all the
> confusion.
> The problem was when RAV was delivered during tick() to our observer
> federate, we produced a very nasty exception, that was unfortunately catched
> by __tick_kernel(). This caused the library to block.

Good to know :-]

May be we can avoid to catch user raised exception we may not be
supposed to catch?
However, we shouldn't be catching exception beside the RTI::XXXX ones.
Did you find a place were we catch something else
(if yes please tell us where)
or did your code raise RTI::XXX exceptions ?

> Thanks for all your efforts & Best regards,

The best problems are those which disappear after some time :-]

--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

--
CERTI-Devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/certi-devel


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]