certi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement


From: Michael Raab
Subject: Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:46:20 +0100

Here it is!

Michael




Dipl.-Inf. Michael Raab

Fraunhofer-Institut für Fabrikbetrieb und -automatisierung IFF
Virtuell Interaktives Training
Sandtorstr. 22, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany                
Telefon +49 (0) 391/ 40 90 122
Telefax +49 (0) 391/ 40 90 115
address@hidden
http://www.iff.fraunhofer.de oder http://www.vdtc.de



Von:        Eric Noulard <address@hidden>
An:        CERTI development discussions <address@hidden>
Datum:        11/22/2010 11:44 AM
Betreff:        Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
Gesendet von:        address@hidden




2010/11/22 Michael Raab <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your effords. Have you changed something in TICK management
> source code?

Nope.
Just added comments and cosmetic indentation issue.

> I did a CVS update and now the 'error' stays the same (TICK
> request cannot be called recursively) but the way to it is different..

The pb with "time-related" issue is that they are hard to reproduce
and may change depending on the machine load...

> I'm attaching a log file that may help to identify the problem.

Looks like the attached file is empty?
Could you resend it?

> It seems to me that there is TICK_REQUEST message missing that should be sent from RTIA
> to libRTI when tick_state changes from TICK_NEXT to TICK_RETURN.
> I inserted some more logging info into RTIA and a hand written comment into
> the respective line of the log file. May be someone can have a short look.

Will try.

--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

--
CERTI-Devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/certi-devel

Attachment: error_tick.log
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]