[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement
From: |
Eric Noulard |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:47:57 +0100 |
2010/11/26 Michael Raab <address@hidden>:
> I catch my exception inside the federate ambassador RAV callback function.
> That is sufficient for me and has no influences on CERTI.
Yes off course you should do that.
What I meant was :
CERTI should not catch any exception it is not supposed to catch,
so if you discover places where we do
catch (...)
or something similar which may "mask" what's hapenning in non-CERTI code
then we should fix that.
--
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, (continued)
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/22
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Eric Noulard, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/26
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement,
Eric Noulard <=
- Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement, Michael Raab, 2010/11/18