Re: [certi-dev] Time advancement

[Eric Noulard]

2010/11/22 Michael Raab <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your effords. Have you changed something in TICK management
> source code?

Nope.
Just added comments and cosmetic indentation issue.

> I did a CVS update and now the 'error' stays the same (TICK
> request cannot be called recursively) but the way to it is different..

The pb with "time-related" issue is that they are hard to reproduce
and may change depending on the machine load...

> I'm attaching a log file that may help to identify the problem.

Looks like the attached file is empty?
Could you resend it?

> It seems to me that there is TICK_REQUEST message missing that should be sent 
> from RTIA
> to libRTI when tick_state changes from TICK_NEXT to TICK_RETURN.
> I inserted some more logging info into RTIA and a hand written comment into
> the respective line of the log file. May be someone can have a short look.

Will try.

-- 
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org