Re: SCM issues (Re: [Chicken-hackers] TinyCLOS 'examples' install path?)

[felix winkelmann]

On 3/9/08, Vincent Manis <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> 2. Consider Chicken itself to be an egg. No, I don't mean some sort of
> weird meta-thinginess involving building via chicken-setup, but just
> initialize the repository when Chicken is installed to hold one egg,
> for the system itself. Then eggs that care about the chicken version
> can declare a dependency on that particular version, just as they would
> for any other egg.

This is something I like - elegant and sort of ..., well,
weird! :-)


cheers,
felix