Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue)

[Leonardo Valeri Manera]

On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>  The versions egg uses the same (sane) principle of version comparison:
>
>   (version>? (string->version "1.501") (string->version "1.6.0")) => #t
>
>  I agree that it is time to sanitize the egg versions, but 501 > 6 and
>  there is nothing I can do about that.

That's what I mean - version numbers have to make sense to that egg,
in the sense that it ill will say (version>? new old) => #t

Leo