[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbe

From: Ivan Raikov
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue)
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:02:19 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

  I don't understand what you mean by that. As long as a version is
defined as a dotted list of integers in decimal representation, 1.501
> 1.6.0. If you want your release versions to be ordered correctly,
then those version numbers have to be a well-ordered sequence in
increasing order and consistent representation. You can't go from
release 1.16 to Aleph.XVII and expect that chicken-setup would know
what to do.


"Leonardo Valeri Manera" <address@hidden> writes:

> On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>>  The versions egg uses the same (sane) principle of version comparison:
>>   (version>? (string->version "1.501") (string->version "1.6.0")) => #t
>>  I agree that it is time to sanitize the egg versions, but 501 > 6 and
>>  there is nothing I can do about that.
> That's what I mean - version numbers have to make sense to that egg,
> in the sense that it ill will say (version>? new old) => #t
> Leo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]