|
| From: | Elf |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-hackers] R6RS |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:58:29 -0700 (PDT) |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) |
Yes, I was involved with this before it was called ERR5RS. :) -elf On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Thomas Chust wrote:
2009/8/4 Ivan Raikov <address@hidden>:There are many good reasons not to support R6RS. You might want to read them here: http://www.r6rs.org/ratification/results.html [...]Hello, it may also be relevant to point to the ERR5RS standardization effort here: http://scheme-punks.cyber-rush.org/wiki/index.php?title=ERR5RS:Charter In my opinion, the APIs specified there, although minimal, are better than those in R6RS... cu, Thomas
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |