Re: [Chicken-hackers] R6RS

[Thomas Chust]

2009/8/4 Ivan Raikov <address@hidden>:
>
> There are many good reasons not to support R6RS. You might want to read
> them here:
>
> http://www.r6rs.org/ratification/results.html
>
> [...]

Hello,

it may also be relevant to point to the ERR5RS standardization effort here:

  http://scheme-punks.cyber-rush.org/wiki/index.php?title=ERR5RS:Charter

In my opinion, the APIs specified there, although minimal, are better
than those in R6RS...

cu,
Thomas


-- 
When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.