[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:21:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:56:55AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> >From now on I'll better ask first, so:
>
> Would anybody be very unhappy if "always?", "none?" and "never?"
> (unit data-structures) get deprecated? They can be trivially defined
> using "constantly". The situation for "any?" is different IMHO, since
> it directly corresponds to a type.
I had no idea we had those :) I won't miss them.
I don't understand how any? is different. What type does it correspond to?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
- [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Christian Kellermann, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, John Cowan, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Peter Bex, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, John Cowan, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Thomas Chust, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Thomas Chust, 2011/08/22