[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:02:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Felix scripsit:
> "none?" is sort of weird, since there is no "none" type - every object
> is of some type.
Sure it's a type, just as the null set is a set. What's more, Chicken's
native type lattice isn't the only type lattice that a program might be
interested in.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
The native charset of SMS messages supports English, French, mainland
Scandinavian languages, German, Italian, Spanish with no accents, and
GREEK SHOUTING. Everything else has to be Unicode, which means you get
only 70 16-bit characters in a text instead of 160 7-bit characters.
- [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Peter Bex, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Christian Kellermann, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, John Cowan, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Peter Bex, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Thomas Chust, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Thomas Chust, 2011/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?, Felix, 2011/08/23