Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?

[Christian Kellermann]

* Peter Bex <address@hidden> [110822 15:20]:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:56:55AM +0200, Felix wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > 
> > >From now on I'll better ask first, so:
> > 
> > Would anybody be very unhappy if "always?", "none?" and "never?"
> > (unit data-structures) get deprecated? They can be trivially defined
> > using "constantly". The situation for "any?" is different IMHO, since
> > it directly corresponds to a type.
> 
> I had no idea we had those :) I won't miss them.
> I don't understand how any? is different.  What type does it correspond to?

I think this has been confused with srfi-1's any. Another reason for
it to go.

Cheers,

Christian

-- 
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will
gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let
movement go on, and the condition of rest will gradually arise.
 -- Lao Tse.