Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?

[Felix]

From: John Cowan <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:02:06 -0400

> Felix scripsit:
> 
>> "none?" is sort of weird, since there is no "none" type - every object
>> is of some type.
> 
> Sure it's a type, just as the null set is a set.  What's more, Chicken's
> native type lattice isn't the only type lattice that a program might be
> interested in.

"(none? <some object>)" makes no sense. And if the core libraries provide
support for the type lattice defined by Chicken, then that's more than
sufficient.


cheers,
felix