Re: [Chicken-hackers] noreturn & clang

[Jörg F. Wittenberger]

Am 06.11.2013 14:47, schrieb Peter Bex:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:35:20PM +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> > Appears that 3.0 does already honor the noreturn declaration.
> >
> > But now it complains about the array subscriptions as gcc did before...
> Can you provide a minimum set of steps which one needs to take in order
> to see this happening, using a clean clone of git master?  AFAIK it's
> fixed and I don't see the messages here, so there must be something
> different between what you're doing and what I'm doing.
>
> Please remember to go through a bootstrap CHICKEN, as well, in order
> to absolutely eliminate most environmental differences.

I'm afraid I *have to* regret.  Save yourself the details.  It's about 
my machine, my time and financial budget and those real world duties, 
which I'm supposed to eventually complete.  I'm going to get real, bad 
trouble if I invest more into chicken.  Loosing today at the failed 
experiment to incorporate the loss of interrupt_reason was already too 
much at the moment.

I'll try to figure these things out, once I'm under less pressure.

Sorry.

/Jörg