[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:36:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:05:00PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> But backporting can be done afterwards, and even just if requested.
> Development on 4 should be phased out, IMHO, excepting critical
> security issues, of course.
Usually it's very little (or no) work to backport. If it isn't, I
totally agree we shouldn't bother.
> I might be interested in the setup stuff, but it will take time, of course
> (it's quite some work to get this working on Windows + UNIX,) Evan's
> work and the setup stuff are the most critical parts to get something up
> and running. The next step would be THE SYSTEM... how about investigating
> this?
Ah yes, there are some small odds and ends that need a little bit of work,
but for the most part it "just works", as you can see from the Salmonella
runs; this uses chicken-install with the same Henrietta that's used for
CHICKEN 4. It is major release-aware now, for the most part. I think
only the "list available eggs" feature doesn't know about releases yet.
I'll take a look at fixing that.
Once the API is stabilised I'll try porting some non-svn eggs to see how
to best handle the transition in established repositories. In the
roadmap I listed the possible options, I think.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Evan Hanson, 2016/02/24
- [Chicken-hackers] force-primordial: proposal of a compromise solution - was Re: slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Evan Hanson, 2016/02/27