[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling
From: |
Jörg F . Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:15:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 |
Am 24.02.2016 um 09:29 schrieb address@hidden:
>> I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
>> scheduler, see
>> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=d9e4c5b8f8473fd1114dcec56c9c8a079b252362
>> However, none of these behaved any different under CHICKEN 4.9.0.1
>> or 4.10.0, so it's not strictly speaking a regression that MUST be fixed
>> before 4.11.
>
> Does it have to be fixed in Chicken 4 at all? I think every effort should put
> into getting
> Chicken 5 ready. The current pace is insane and will not be sustainable
> forever. Let's
> get 4.11 out and then turn to new things.
Not necessarily.
But it may make it much, much easier for me to participate in the process.
Those scheduler bugs are the reason why I'm forced to distribute a
modified version of chicken (with a modified scheduler) for several
years along with the software, which those bugs break. I'd love to get
rid of that deviation. It burns my time for no good reason.
At this point I'm not able to make complete transition from 4.9 to 4.11
because I'm loosing too much to make practical use of it.
I have no idea so far what changes are coming in from chicken 5 and I
won't be able to find out if I can't run my code.
Please don't leave me hanging.
Cheers
/Jörg
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling,
Jörg F . Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Evan Hanson, 2016/02/24
- [Chicken-hackers] force-primordial: proposal of a compromise solution - was Re: slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24