[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jdiff.sh
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: jdiff.sh |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:20:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.6 |
Am Freitag, 20. September 2002 10:38 schrieb Giannis Georgalis:
> Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> > I think it would be very useful to have an
> > automatically-generated API comparison page for Classpath-vs-JDK
> > (and another for libgcj-vs-JDK). Anybody want to volunteer :-)?
> >
> > Tom
>
> I already volunteered! And let's make it more interesting... If it
> does not find a specific method/ constructor/ ... in GNU classpath
> source it should write one (:))...well I mean if it does not find
> eg. the constructor "public File(URI uri)" it should make a backup
> copy of File.java and add to the original:
I generated a file containing all "violations" for libgcj. The file is
over 470kb big. It would be more productive to eliminate the false
positives then thinking about auto-adding of missing methods.
The adding should be optional if added, not automatically.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
GPG-key: http://konqueror.dyndns.org/~mkoch/michael.gpg
- jdiff.sh, Giannis Georgalis, 2002/09/19
- Re: jdiff.sh, Stuart Ballard, 2002/09/19
- Re: jdiff.sh, Tom Tromey, 2002/09/19
- Re: jdiff.sh, Giannis Georgalis, 2002/09/20
- Re: jdiff.sh, Stuart Ballard, 2002/09/20
- IMPLEMENTATION (was, Re: jdiff.sh), C. Scott Ananian, 2002/09/20
- Re: IMPLEMENTATION (was, Re: jdiff.sh), Tom Tromey, 2002/09/24
- Re: jdiff.sh,
Michael Koch <=
- Re: jdiff.sh, Michael Koch, 2002/09/20
japize, Brian Jones, 2002/09/29