[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?]
From: |
John |
Subject: |
[Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?] |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jul 2001 14:33:30 -0500 |
Sounds like something similar I once read on the SAMBA site? No/Yes...
still it's a good idea and it has my vote in theory.
The shared source part is especially important, but we'll need something
like:
>
Include in the header of your code "I certify under penalty of perjury
and the laws of my applicaBle state, district, commonwealth, country, or
planet of legal residence that I have not (blah blah blah) viewed any
source code directly related to this coding that is not distributed
under the GPL or a recognized compatible license."
That's safest... some legal beagle correct me if I'm incorrect.
John Le'Brecage
Matthew Copeland wrote:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Special note
>
> If you have looked at Microsoft's implementation of .NET or their shared
> source code, you will not be able to contribute to Mono.
>
> Please, follow care when reading code
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You know, I saw this on the ximian website for contributing to mono, and
> it could be very worthwhile to us to add something similar to our website,
> so that we don't get into any nasty situations with lawsuits from
> Microsoft. We all konw how Microsoft tactics work when it comes to
> competitors.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Matthew M. Copeland
- [Fwd: [DotGNU]A good warning?],
John <=