[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?
From: |
Bradley M. Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:14:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
> > If no serious objections are made by then, it will be a decision
> > by consensus.
> >
> > If serious objections (that make sense to me) are made, I will
> > post a modified proposal.
I have no serious objection per se, but I do believe we should include the
GNU Enterprise and phpGroupware projects as part of the consensus
process, and perhaps find some way that the three projects together make
such decisions. After all, decisions about these kinds of protocols
across GNU will effect all of these projects.
-- bkuhn
pgpq_gQJvfhzu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 2002/04/10
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Bradley M. Kuhn, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, David Sugar, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Gopal.V, 2002/04/13
- Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/04/13
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Chris Smith, 2002/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 2002/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 2002/04/16