[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber? |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:04:51 -0400 |
"Bradley M. Kuhn" wrote:
>
> > > If no serious objections are made by then, it will be a decision
> > > by consensus.
> > >
> > > If serious objections (that make sense to me) are made, I will
> > > post a modified proposal.
>
> I have no serious objection per se, but I do believe we should include the
> GNU Enterprise and phpGroupware projects as part of the consensus
> process, and perhaps find some way that the three projects together make
> such decisions. After all, decisions about these kinds of protocols
> across GNU will effect all of these projects.
>
Whatever happened to GNU-RPC?
(That is the project to abstract all middleware protocols into one
package).... Wouldn't that be a good place to start?
-Barry
- [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 2002/04/10
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Bradley M. Kuhn, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, David Sugar, 2002/04/12
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Gopal.V, 2002/04/13
- Re: [CoreTeam]Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/04/13
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Chris Smith, 2002/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Peter Saint-Andre, 2002/04/15
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, Adam Theo, 2002/04/16
- Re: [DotGNU]To What Degree Jabber?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/17