Re: [DotGNU]Bugs to the list

[James Michael DuPont]

--- Rhys Weatherley <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 March 2003 08:34 pm, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> 
> > I think mdupont makes an important point... this should be a
> separate
> > list.
> 
> The problem with that is it sort of gets us back to the original
> problem: very 
> few people see the bugs because they don't know where to look, and so
> the 
> level of help drops off.  I was hoping for a more "in our faces"
> approach.
> 
> Could we trial sending the bugs to "address@hidden" for a few
> weeks, 
> and then split it off if people start to complain?  Perhaps even
> create a 
> "address@hidden" for general pnet discussion and bugs if
> it seems 
> worthwhile.
> 
> Anyway, I'm easy - either way will work for me since I get the bugs
> mailed to 
> me regardless.  It's really up to the rest of the community.

I think that one list with all the pnet development issues, bugs and
cvs would be good.  A weekly summary posted to dotgnu would be fine.

In fact, weekly summaries of things are really what we need, the parrot
weekly report is really good to read.

mike


=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com