[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain
From: |
Gabriel Ambuehl |
Subject: |
Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:20:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) |
On Friday 13 February 2009 16:57:48 Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> If you have access to the target directory, you could move the previous
> incremental backup files out of the way, perform an incremental, and get
> the duplicity equivalent of a differential. However, and this is very
> important, the resulting incremental backup would not be the same as a
> differential backup. A differential backup creates a complete copy of
> the changed file. A duplicity incremental backup creates a difference
> set of changes to the original file.
How hard would it be to add a mode where duplicity stores the full files of
all changed files? For the people too paranoid to trust rsync...
- [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, edgar . soldin, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Kennon Ballou, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Marcus Williams, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain,
Gabriel Ambuehl <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Marcus Williams, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, edgar . soldin, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Richard Scott, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Richard Scott, 2009/02/13