[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets
From: |
Lluís Batlle i Rossell |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:56:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:52:29AM -0800, email builder wrote:
> Does anyone have any advice of other software that allows
> encrypted mirroring (possibly without doing full backups
> every time)?
Well, rsync makes little data transfer because *both* sides have access to the
information. For many, having the remote side have the deciphering password even
if only for a while, looks like no security.
If you don't care on the roller checksum, and simply block deduplication would
work for you, you can use a backup based on content-addressing like libchop:
http://www.nongnu.org/libchop/
That will allow small data transfers on incremental backups with a quite dumb
remote side, that will never know the ciphering.
You will need a mechanism to trigger the remote garbage collection based on your
requirements, though, for it to throw away old versions.
Regards,
Lluís.
- [Duplicity-talk] Newbie/General Questions, email builder, 2011/12/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Newbie/General Questions, SanskritFritz, 2011/12/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Newbie/General Questions, edgar . soldin, 2011/12/04
- [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets (was: Newbie/General Questions), email builder, 2011/12/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, edgar . soldin, 2011/12/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, email builder, 2011/12/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, SanskritFritz, 2011/12/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, Eliot Moss, 2011/12/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, Jan Niggemann, 2011/12/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets,
Lluís Batlle i Rossell <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, Chris Poole, 2011/12/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Mirroring vs. Sets, email builder, 2011/12/08