Re: [Duplicity-talk] Using as a more efficient sync mechanism

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On 19/07/12 02:05 PM, Tim Riemenschneider wrote:
> Hm, in this use-case I would use "rsync --write-batch" (or maybe
> --only-write-batch?) and "rsync --read-batch"; at least what I read from
> the man-page, that is exactly what is needed, isn't it?

Not quite -- this doesn't work when hosts are in various stages of sync.
E.g. if host5 has been down for maintenance and missed a couple of
syncs, then it has to apply multiple batches. Keeping track of those
becomes difficult.

Best,
-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Systems Administrator
Linux Foundation, kernel.org
Montréal, Québec

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature