[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?
From: |
Lluís Batlle i Rossell |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> But having one extra volume as a XOR result seems (naively) like not so
> complicated idea, doesn't it?
Exactly, that's why I implemented it in my case.
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <address@hidden>wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> > > Thanks. But as duplicity uses checksums extensively, etc. why not add
> > some
> > > level of redundancy?
> > > (on the other hand I believe there must be good reasons not to implement
> > it
> > > if it is still not there)
> >
> > In fact I don't use duplicity much; I use mainly a program I wrote,
> > 'btar', and
> > there I added at least one block of redundancy with XOR. :)
> >
> > More redundancy is a bit more complicated (requiring lots of memory).
> >
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <
> > address@hidden>wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:35:13PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> > > > > Are there any works on adding some form of archive redundancy to
> > > > duplicity?
> > > > >
> > > > > If I understand correctly one bit-flip can destroy the whole
> > duplicity
> > > > > backup, am I right?
> > > >
> > > > It will destroy one file of the backup, I think. The backup has
> > multiple
> > > > files.
> > > >
> > > > It will require hand work, but it's not that the whole backup will
> > > > disappear,
> > > > iiuc.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
- [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?,
Lluís Batlle i Rossell <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, edgar . soldin, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, edgar . soldin, 2013/05/24
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, edgar . soldin, 2013/05/23
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, zooko, 2013/05/23