duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed


From: Chris Vanden Berghe
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:34:07 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0

Hi Kenneth,

The data on the server does not change very often. I do a full backup
once per month and incremental in between. I keep the backup chains for
2 months.

# du -h duplicity-full-signature*.gpg
1018M   duplicity-full-signatures.20160715T164934Z.sigtar.gpg

Regards,
Chris.

---
On 15/07/2016 19:55, Kenneth Loafman via Duplicity-talk wrote:
> Jumping in here... How often do you do FULL backups?  Are you building
> a long chain of incrementals?  What was the size of the last
> duplicity-full-signature*.gpg file?  
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 5:59 AM, <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     ok
>      http://docs.pythonboto.org/en/latest/releasenotes/v2.41.0.html
>     does not list any memory specific fix.
>     remember now you already use duplicity 0.7.08 .. so no updates
>     necessary.
>
>     next would probably be patching duplicity to output memory usage
>     when in max verbosity. don't see anybody doing that unfortunately,
>     do you offer :) ?  i'll cc Ken the maintainer, maybe he has
>     another idea?
>
>     to make sure it is duplicity and not the backend code, you could
>     do a backup w/ identical settings to a local file:// target and
>     see if the second run sports the same symptoms you experience now.
>
>     additionally can you send me a _complete_ terminal output of the
>     killed duplicity run. you may want obfuscate strings in it beforehand.
>
>     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
>
>     On 15.07.2016 12:37, edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>     > ok. before we go further - please make sure you have the latest
>     duplicity release and latest boto, if not install them locally
>     (sent you the mini howto earlier).
>     >
>     > can you run a verify or does that also die assuming you run a
>     backup command?
>     >
>     > ..ede
>     >
>     > On 15.07.2016 11:45, Chris Vanden Berghe via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>     >> Scrolling down was too obvious, I guess ;-) I have attached a
>     screenshot
>     >> of what I see a second before Duplicity is killed.
>     >>
>     >> The source files are ~82 GB. The last successful backup:
>     >>
>     >> # /usr/bin/duplicity collection-status
>     --archive-dir=/root/Backup/cache/
>     >> gs://bobo-backup/
>     >> Local and Remote metadata are synchronized, no sync needed.
>     >> Last full backup date: Mon Jul  4 17:11:39 2016
>     >> Collection Status
>     >> -----------------
>     >> Connecting with backend: BackendWrapper
>     >> Archive dir: /root/Backup/cache/01f81df3eb37282f76c93fb89a3708f5
>     >>
>     >> Found 0 secondary backup chains.
>     >>
>     >> Found primary backup chain with matching signature chain:
>     >> -------------------------
>     >> Chain start time: Mon Jul  4 17:11:39 2016
>     >> Chain end time: Mon Jul  4 17:11:39 2016
>     >> Number of contained backup sets: 1
>     >> Total number of contained volumes: 254
>     >>  Type of backup set:                            Time:      Num
>     volumes:
>     >>                 Full         Mon Jul  4 17:11:39 2016         
>          254
>     >> -------------------------
>     >> No orphaned or incomplete backup sets found.
>     >>
>     >> Regards,
>     >> Chris.
>     >>
>     >> ---
>     >> On 15/07/2016 15:36, edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>     >>>> On 15.07.2016 05:39, Chris Vanden Berghe via Duplicity-talk
>     wrote:> Hi Edgar,
>     >>>>> I was unsuccessful in getting useful data from htop. It
>     seems like tree
>     >>>>> view and sorting on memory usage features are mutually
>     exclusive in
>     >>>>> htop... so when I enable tree view I no longer see the
>     duplicity process
>     >>>>> (off screen) and when I sort on memory I do not see
>     Duplicity's children
>     >>>>> (if any).
>     >>>> hehe, read into how htop works. you can scroll the list w/
>     the cursor keys.
>     >>>>
>     >>> sort by tree _and_ memory are mutually exclusive. so you have
>     to sort by tree and scroll to duplicity, make the terminal big
>     enough to see all it's sub processes and look out for the culprit
>     yourself.
>     >>>
>     >>> btw. how big is your backup. size of data, number/size of
>     volumes per full/chain.
>     >>>
>     >>> ..ede
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >>> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>     >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]