[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbrevia
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:11:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 |
hey Felix,
see inline
On 19.07.2022 08:51, Felix Prüter via Duplicity-talk wrote:
Hi,
I use duplicity 0.7.19.
duplicity is outdated and not maintained any more. please upgrade to latest
0.8.23 and see if the error persists.
Full and incremental backups to a webdav server responding with <D:multistatus
xmlns:D="DAV:">(...) work.
Full backups to a webdav server responding with <ns0:multistatus
xmlns:ns0="DAV:">(...) work as well.
BUT incremental backups to a webdav server responding with <ns0:multistatus
xmlns:ns0="DAV:">(...) does NOT work.
Snippet from the log:
WebDAV PROPFIND /seafdav/mail7/mail7-tmp/ request2 with headers: {'Connection':
'keep-alive', 'Depth': '1', 'Authorization': 'Basic dGl0dXN...lFVUDRSTw=='}
WebDAV data length: 95
WebDAV response2 status 207 with reason 'Multi-Status'.
Last full backup date: none
that's not enough information. run duplicity with max. verbosity '-v9' and
pastebin the full error stack, remove information you deem private in it first.
Does the webdav backend require a "d" as abbreviation for the xml namespace and
does not parse the xml response otherwise?
can't tell, but feel free to have a look in
https://gitlab.com/duplicity/duplicity/-/blob/main/duplicity/backends/webdavbackend.py
alternatively you may try to use lftp+webdav[s]:// or rclone:// backend
instead, both support webdav. check the manpage
https://duplicity.us/vers8/duplicity.1.html on how to set them up.
good luck! ..ede/duply.net
- [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, Felix Prüter, 2022/07/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, Felix Prüter, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, Kenneth Loafman, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, edgar . soldin, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, edgar . soldin, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, Kenneth Loafman, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, edgar . soldin, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, edgar . soldin, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, Felix, 2022/07/27
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Does duplicity rely on a special namespace abbreviation in webdav respones?, edgar . soldin, 2022/07/28