[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Boruch Baum |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:49:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 22:57:34 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > If you don't want these features yourself and nobody else in the project
> > wants them either, the only way I can think of making a compelling
> > argument for people to develop those feature is to ask real people and
> > get real responses. I am fairly confident that if you had a testimony or
> > user-test from actual people stating that a feature is missing, then
> > people here would help develop that feature.
>
> I agree. Before we put time into developing a feature, we should verify
> that many people would like it.
>
> Speaking of which, it would be useful to sit down with a new user just
> trying Emacs and see what perse actually complains about or requests.
> If several people do this, it could give us useful ideas of what changes
> would actually make Emacs more appealing to new users.
How about using existing download statistics from some source like
MELPA? That would be more empirical / less anecdotal, and would cast a
wider net. Other data sources might be link-click-quantity from github
or google analytics or stackexchange.
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Tassilo Horn, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/07
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Boruch Baum <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, TEC, 2020/09/08