[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Philip K. |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:08:25 +0200 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: "Philip K." <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2020-09
>> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:14:29 +0200
>>
>> And regarding modernizing defaults, how about bundling a few "themes"
>> that enable/disable a few settings. It might be confusing at first, as
>> most people associate themes with visual customisations, but since Emacs
>> interprets the term more generally, adding themes such as "Modern" that
>> enables more bells and whistles (I'm not too enthusiastic about the
>> name, some might have chosen "Hipster" instead :^)), "Minimal" that
>> reduces UI, etc. might be a compromise between the fractions that want
>> to make Emacs appealing to newcomers and those that don't want to break
>> Emacs' way-of-operating by default.
>
> We already have a couple of such themes, so the issue of us accepting
> such themes doesn't exist.
Oh, I didn't know that? Is this being done in a separate feature branch?
> P.S. Please review your MUA settings, because they just caused Emacs
> to exclude the mailing list from the recipients, something that is
> unwanted.
My apologies, again, I use Gnus to follow the mailing list, but forget
that unlike Rmail, it doesn't reply to every when 'R' is pressed.
--
Philip K.
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/08
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Philip K., 2020/09/10
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Tassilo Horn, 2020/09/11
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/07
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08
Re: Changes for emacs 28, Boruch Baum, 2020/09/08