[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user pe
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:41:19 -0700 |
If loading multiple files is an optimization concern, that can be
dealt with in a manner similar to package-quickstart ---
Ergus writes:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:53:14AM -0700, Drew Adams wrote:
> >> From: Tim Cross ...
> >
> >Lots of interesting suggestions and observations.
> >
> >In particular, this one:
> >
> > rather than the 'custom section' or custom file
> > would be to have custom write individual files
> > into a ~/.emacs.d/custom directory?
> >
> >(I'd prefer that the dir location be the value of
> >a user option, with ~/.emacs.d/custom as default value. But I think the
> >idea is a good one.)
> >___
> >
> >
> >One thing I wouldn't mind having is some kind of timestamp on each
> >`custom-set-variables' and `custom-set-faces' entry. Or something
> >equivalent. Or optional sorting by recency of modification. Or maybe such
> >info in a separate log file.
> >
> >Just a spur-of-the-moment thought, not carefully considered. It comes from
> >seeing an entry and wondering when the hell I added it (or why). ;-)
>
> In general having more and more files to read on startup is bad for
> startup time and organization (not all of us have ssd).
>
> Improving the current custom but sorting, grouping or anything is in my
> opinion a better approach.
>
> I would also prefer that the custom file will be separated by default to
> prevent emacs changing the user's init file so it can be tracked with
> git without needing:
>
> ```
> (setq custom-file (expand-file-name "custom.el" user-emacs-directory))
>
> (unless (file-exists-p custom-file)
> (write-region "" nil custom-file))
>
> (load custom-file)
> ```
--
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉
--
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉
- Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", (continued)
- Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", T.V Raman, 2020/09/08
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Daniel MartÃn, 2020/09/08
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Richard Stallman, 2020/09/08
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Tim Cross, 2020/09/09
- RE: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Drew Adams, 2020/09/09
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/09
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28",
T.V Raman <=
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Ergus, 2020/09/09
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", T.V Raman, 2020/09/09
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Juri Linkov, 2020/09/09
- Re: Custom Et Al: Build-Up The Underlying Platform was Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28", Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: about fido-mode, Ergus, 2020/09/08
- Re: about fido-mode, andrés ramÃrez, 2020/09/08
- Re: about fido-mode, Ergus, 2020/09/08
- Re: about fido-mode, andrés ramÃrez, 2020/09/08
- Re: about fido-mode, Ergus, 2020/09/08
- Re: about fido-mode, andrés ramÃrez, 2020/09/08