[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:52:49 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:26:15 +0000, Gregory Heytings <ghe@sdf.org> said:
>>
>> Gregory has a 'Reply-To' header which points at ghe@sdf.org. I guess
>> your Outlook client honours it a bit too much
>>
Gregory> Indeed. I know this, but I don't know why this is the case (*). I
Gregory> used to explicitly set Reply-To to emacs-devel@gnu.org in my MUA,
but
Gregory> Eli asked me to stop to do this.
I think in that case rmail replies only to emacs-devel@, which means
Eli has to add back the other recipients. Eli, do we need a "reply to
'From+To+CC+Reply-To'" feature in rmail? ("wide reply" in Gnus parlance).
Gregory> (*) I guess, but I'm not 100% sure, that Mailman honors the strict
Gregory> DMARC policy ("quarantine") of the the sdf.org domain. So mails
sent
Gregory> from that domain are forwared to the list with a "From:
Gregory> emacs-devel@gnu.org Reply-To: <original sender>" while those sent
from
Gregory> other domains are forwared to the list with a "From: <original
sender> ".
Yes, that matches the Mailman documentation. Iʼm not sure what a good
solution is; Mailman adding a Reply-To with both the sender and
emacs-devel would no doubt also break either Outlook or rmail or
both. Not adding a Reply-To at all means the sender would get dropped
<sigh>.
Robert
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/12
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10