[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:39:20 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:47 +0000, Gregory Heytings <ghe@sdf.org> said:
>>
>> Yes, that matches the Mailman documentation. Iʼm not sure what a
>> good solution is; Mailman adding a Reply-To with both the sender and
>> emacs-devel would no doubt also break either Outlook or rmail or
>> both. Not adding a Reply-To at all means the sender would get
>> dropped <sigh>.
>>
Gregory> In fact not adding a Reply-To would be perfect, at least for
Gregory> me. Presumably someone who sends a message to a list has
subscribed to
Gregory> the list, of if they are not, it's common to mention explicitly
that
Gregory> they are not.
That works if their email address is mentioned in one of the headers
of the message, but in this case yours wouldnʼt be (unless you CC
yourself explicitly, which is an imposition on the sender)
DMARC/DKIM/SPF, what hath ye wrought?
Robert
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/12
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/12
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/10
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/09