Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking

[Stefan Monnier]

> The non-GNU ELPA is supposed to be a repository for packages which are GPL
> compliant and it is a reasonable expectation that those who make their
> packages GPL compliant do so because they support the philosophical goals
> of the FSF.

The overwhelming majority of ELisp packages out there are hosted on
Github (that also applies to many GNU ELPA packages, many of them are
developed by long time contributors to Emacs), so I think the evidence
shows the above expectation doesn't hold at all.


        Stefan