Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > "is NOT part of GNU Emacs.",

   GNU ELPA is both part and not-part of Emacs, AFAIC, so I'm fine
   with that.

I don't understand, it cannot be both or neither.  Either it is part
of Emacs, or it is not.

   > is copyrighted by the FSF but Artur Malabarba who is the author of
   > this package has no entry in the copyright.list?

   He sure does (with a few more names between Artur and Malabarba).

Ah, I only searched on the email and name.  Thank you for the
correction.