Re: Eglot to core [Was: rmsbolt.el [Was: Colorful line numbers]]

[Philip Kaludercic]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I look forward to Eglot being included with Emacs.  But (and I've said
>> this before) "eglot" is a very bad name that says nothing about its
>> purpose.  How about renaming it "language-server"?
>
> I don't like idea conflating the names with the descriptions, because it
> inevitably leads to conflicts.  

What kind of conflicts?

>                                 So I see no need to rename it.
> But we can definitely add various ways to make it easier to find, such
> as adding a `language-server-mode` alias.

If this is done, it would also be helpful to add alii for commands like
`eglot-code-actions', `eglot-rename', `eglot-format', etc. to avoid
confusion.