Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:46:27 +0300, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> said:

    >>>> Ok, then let's use describe-char-fold-equivalences:
    >>> 
    >>> Ah, that lists *all* the equivalences. I was thinking more along the
    >>> lines of the following (we can give it a different name, or combine 
them)
    >> 
    >> I indeed think we should only show the equivalence sequences of a
    >> single character.  Showing all of them is too much.

    Juri> Why the user should not be allowed to see all active equivalences?

We can always add an 'all' argument, but most people would be
searching for the equivalences for a particular character, I thought
(I have no evidence for this, but it seems like the obvious use-case).

Robert
--