Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Juri Linkov]

>> >> Why the user should not be allowed to see all active equivalences?
>> >
>> > We can always add an 'all' argument, but most people would be
>> > searching for the equivalences for a particular character, I thought
>> > (I have no evidence for this, but it seems like the obvious use-case).
>>
>> Wouldn't it be more natural instead of a special argument 'all'
>> to add a 'char' argument that will describe the equivalences
>> for a particular character, and when 'nil' then will describe
>> all characters.
>
> Only if we believe that most users will want 'all'.

Do we believe that most users want only describe-key,
but not describe-bindings that describes all keys?