Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Juri Linkov]

>> No need to use outlines.  The output looks nice
>> with plain lists where 'C-x =' can be used on any
>> character to get its name:
>
> How long is the list?
>
> And what happens if the user customizes char-fold.el to add more
> equivalent sequences?

I have a huge list of 6682 customized equivalences, and there is
no problem with displaying all of them.

> And once again, why not have two separate commands, one for each use
> case?

It's fine to have two separate commands, maybe with names like:

  M-x describe-char-fold-equivalence
  M-x describe-char-fold-equivalences