Re: emacs-28 a866674b2a: Fix inaccuracies in "lax search" documentation

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:13:20 +0200
> 
> >>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:46:27 +0300, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> said:
> 
>     >>>> Ok, then let's use describe-char-fold-equivalences:
>     >>> 
>     >>> Ah, that lists *all* the equivalences. I was thinking more along the
>     >>> lines of the following (we can give it a different name, or combine 
> them)
>     >> 
>     >> I indeed think we should only show the equivalence sequences of a
>     >> single character.  Showing all of them is too much.
> 
>     Juri> Why the user should not be allowed to see all active equivalences?
> 
> We can always add an 'all' argument, but most people would be
> searching for the equivalences for a particular character, I thought
> (I have no evidence for this, but it seems like the obvious use-case).

That was also my impression.