[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docstring hack
|
From: |
Po Lu |
|
Subject: |
Re: Docstring hack |
|
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jul 2022 10:17:54 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> TBH I don't really understand your 5 alternatives, because you are
> alluding to symbols I cannot find in the sources: I see neither
> read_literal_string nor dynamic-docstring. Are those typos or am I
> blind?
I think he means read_string_literal and
byte-compile-dynamic-docstrings.
- Re: Docstring hack, (continued)
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Po Lu, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/30
- Re: Docstring hack,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Po Lu, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Po Lu, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Stefan Monnier, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Lynn Winebarger, 2022/07/31
- Re: Docstring hack, Po Lu, 2022/07/31