[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:38:17 -0400 |
Hi Anuj,
> > Alexei?
>
> Okay, I will probably only need to remove this case statement.
> ```
> case FT_GLYPH_FORMAT_BITMAP: /* already a bitmap, don't do anything */
> break;
> ```
Ok to remove. This only optimizes mistaken calls to FT_Render_Glyph on
bitmap fonts. A related question is whether we need FT_LOAD_TARGET_SDF
for FT_Load_Glyph?
Indeed, the bitmap-to-sdf renderer should be separate as it hardly
shares anything.
I would be less worried about FT_Property_Set if FreeType reserved the
right to remove (ignore) or change properties when it is reasonable to
do so, i.e. properties should not be considered a part of API.
Alexei
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, (continued)
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/17
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/07/18
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/19
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/19
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/15
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/15
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/16
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/16
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/07/16