[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2020 06:42:46 +0200 (CEST) |
>> I would be less worried about FT_Property_Set if FreeType reserved
>> the right to remove (ignore) or change properties when it is
>> reasonable to do so, i.e. properties should not be considered a
>> part of API.
>
> Does that mean I shouldn't use `FT_Property_Set' ? For some
> parameters such as `spread' there is no other way to dynamically set
> it.
You definitely should use `FT_Property_Set`. However, as done in
other modules, we declare (some of) the properties as 'experimental'
in the documentation so that we can change or remove them if
necessary.
Werner
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, (continued)
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/17
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/07/18
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/19
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/19
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/07/15
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/15
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/07/15
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Anuj Verma, 2020/07/16
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Freetype-devel] Re: GSOC - Distance Fields, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/07/16