[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response
From: |
Robert \(Jamie\) Munro |
Subject: |
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2003 12:50:09 +0100 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Hudson
> Sent: 18 May 2003 20:38
> To: FSFE-UK
> Subject: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response
>
> This is, I guess, an understandable position, if not a desirable one.
> So the first line of attack is probably to ensure the they codify any
> attempt at the 'status quo' as tightly as possible. Stuff like:
>
> "The proposed Directive would set a fair test for software (deciding
> whether it has a technical effect) before authorizing a patent."
>
> ... is useful. What is this proposed wonder test? What is the hard
> definition of 'technical effect'?
I think the way it should work is that if you are using a "normal" computer,
no matter what code is running on it, you cannot be infringing a patent. Who
cares what is then patented - as long as you aren't using special hardware,
you cannot be in violation.
Robert Munro
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response,
Robert \(Jamie\) Munro <=
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robin Green, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Karl Naylor, 2003/05/19