[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response
|
From: |
MJ Ray |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 11:34:09 -0000 |
|
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
Alex Hudson <address@hidden> wrote:
> I remember asking someone at the UKPTO about this, and the example of a
> 'technical effect' they came up with was a piece of software which, when
> run, evened out/lowered the temperature on the surface of the main CPU.
So the equivalent of calling the idle call lots would be patentable if
there wasn't prior art?!
Stop the world, I want to get off :-/
--
MJR
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robert \(Jamie\) Munro, 2003/05/19
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response,
MJ Ray <=
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robin Green, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Karl Naylor, 2003/05/19
Fw: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robin Green, 2003/05/19