[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response
From: |
Alex Hudson |
Subject: |
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response |
Date: |
20 May 2003 07:19:35 +0100 |
Hi Robert,
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 12:50, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
> I think the way it should work is that if you are using a "normal" computer,
> no matter what code is running on it, you cannot be infringing a patent. Who
> cares what is then patented - as long as you aren't using special hardware,
> you cannot be in violation.
I remember asking someone at the UKPTO about this, and the example of a
'technical effect' they came up with was a piece of software which, when
run, evened out/lowered the temperature on the surface of the main CPU.
Unfortunately, they weren't actually able to give a definition of
'technical effect'.
Cheers,
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, (continued)
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robert \(Jamie\) Munro, 2003/05/19
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response,
Alex Hudson <=
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robin Green, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Karl Naylor, 2003/05/19