[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response
From: |
Robin Green |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response |
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 14:01:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:33:21PM +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
> The useful thing about this particular definition of 'technical effect'
> means that the software has to manifest itself physically somehow. So,
> any software that doesn't interact with the physical world isn't covered.
> So, just don't run it on hardware :oD
Oh, great. So possessing it (covered code) will not be illegal, but running it
will be. What an improvement, not.
>
> > Stop the world, I want to get off :-/
>
> Ain't that the truth.
*runs off screaming*
--
Robin
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robert \(Jamie\) Munro, 2003/05/19
RE: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response,
Robin Green <=
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, MJ Ray, 2003/05/20
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Karl Naylor, 2003/05/19
Fw: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Software patent MEP response, Robin Green, 2003/05/19